Drawing for ZABA'S

USPTO serial 78358819

ZABA'S

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RINGLE, JAMES W
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with ZABA'S?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Leigh Augustine, Charles Luce, Paul Wood, Burkeley Riggs

MATTHEW A. MORR MOYE WHITE LLP1400 SIXTEENTH STREET 6TH FLOORDENVER, CO 80202-1473UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
043Restaurant servicesABANDONEDOct 10, 2001

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 23, 2008MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Sep 23, 2008ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Sep 23, 2008OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jul 10, 2008OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Jun 5, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 5, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 30, 2004OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Nov 22, 2004ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Oct 26, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 6, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 9, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 30, 2004PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 27, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 20, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 19, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 6, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance