USPTO serial 78359230
ECHO VALLEY FRUIT & FIBER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3607528Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 14, 2009
- Examiner
- MCCRAY, RENEE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ECHO VALLEY FRUIT & FIBER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Clinton H. Wilkinson
CLINTON H WILKINSON LAW OFFICES OF CHARLES A WILKINSONPO BOX 142668 E BROAD STBETHLEHEM, PA 18016-1426Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Alpaca fiber goods and products in the nature of clothing, namely, sweaters, coats, capes, jackets, scarves, shawls, stoles, dresses, suits, tops, pants, mittens, shirts, hats, gloves, and socks | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 29, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Diamond Triple C Ranch
- Other trademarks owned by Diamond Triple C Ranch
- Other trademarks owned by Diamond Triple C Ranch
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named ECHO VALLEY FRUIT & FIBER
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 20, 2015 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 14, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 10, 2009 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 6, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 4, 2009 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 3, 2009 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 26, 2009 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2009 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Sep 3, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 3, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 26, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 26, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 11, 2008 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 26, 2007 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 28, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 8, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 23, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 23, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 7, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 21, 2006 | ATRQ | ATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED | — |
| Aug 30, 2006 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 28, 2006 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 11, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 23, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 23, 2006 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 23, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 23, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 23, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 15, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 13, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 15, 2005 | GRML | CORRESPONDENCE E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2005 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 28, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 17, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 17, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 18, 2005 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 18, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 18, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 3, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 3, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 1, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 1, 2004 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 21, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 9, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |