USPTO serial 78360175
KIST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHOE, KELLY
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with KIST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Atlantic Beach, FL
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Sun care preparations, namely, mosturizers, sunscreens, suncare lotions, suntan lotions and sunblock lotions, cosmetics, after-sun lotions, age retardant gel, anti- bacterial skin soaps, anti-aging cream, bath foam, bath gel, bath pearls, beauty masks, blush, body cream, body oil, body scrub,body sprays,cocoa butter for cosmetic purposes, deodorants and anti perspirants, eye cream,eye shadow, eyebrow pencils, hair dye, hair lighteners, hair lotion, hair shampoo and hair conditioner, lip gloss, lip stick, make up, body glitter, nail glitter | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 18, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 18, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 26, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 23, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 10, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |