USPTO serial 78360225
GENENEWS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4573983Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 29, 2014
- Examiner
- OH, WON TEAK
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with GENENEWS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Richmond Hill, CA
Richmond Hill, Ontario, CA
Richmond Hill, Ontario, CA
Toronto, CA
MARKHAM, ONTARIO, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrew S. Ehard
ANDREW S. EHARD MERCHANT & GOULD P.C.PO BOX 2910MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-0910UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Research and development, validation testing, data analysis and product development in the fields of biology, systems biology, biochemistry, molecular biology and genomics, proteomics, diagnostics, pharmacogenomics, toxicogenomics and personalized medicine; computer services, namely, computer tracking of databases of life sciences information via computer networks in the field of personalized medicine | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 044 | Diagnostic services, namely, diagnosing, preventing and predicting disease, identifying disease risk factors, diagnostic testing, gene and protein testing, identifying physiological characteristics, establishing individual preventative care programs, establishing disease treatment based on gene and protein expression and/or activity, evaluation of clinical trial progress, and drug monitoring and monitoring of patient health progression; providing genomic, proteomic and gene expression profiles useful in selecting therapeutics, evaluating the efficacy and toxicity of treatments and evaluating treatment progression, prognosing disease or disease progression and identifying disease heredity risk factors; computer services, namely, providing access to databases of life sciences information via computer networks in the field of personalized medicine, including phannacogenomic and toxicogenomic information | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by GENENEWS LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by GENENEWS LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by GENENEWS LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by ChondroGene Limited
- Other trademarks owned by GENENEWS LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named GENENEWS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 5, 2021 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 25, 2015 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 29, 2014 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 24, 2014 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| May 29, 2014 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| May 29, 2014 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 29, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2014 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 24, 2014 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 5, 2013 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 1, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| May 30, 2013 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 30, 2013 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 30, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 27, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Nov 23, 2012 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 23, 2012 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 23, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 7, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2012 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 5, 2012 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 6, 2011 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 25, 2011 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| May 3, 2011 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 12, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 23, 2011 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 4, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 28, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 11, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 11, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 28, 2011 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 3, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 3, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 6, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 6, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 6, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 21, 2010 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 5, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 4, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 19, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 19, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 19, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 2, 2009 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 26, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 26, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 19, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 19, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 19, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 27, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 26, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 15, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 15, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 20, 2007 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Sep 20, 2007 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 22, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 11, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 24, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 24, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 22, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 22, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 19, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 29, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 20, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 20, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 24, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 23, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 13, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 13, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 24, 2005 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 21, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 7, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 17, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 1, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 1, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 30, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 28, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 23, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 10, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |