USPTO serial 78360231
NANOGENIC TECHNOLOGY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GAST, PAUL
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NANOGENIC TECHNOLOGY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Marina del Rey, CA
Marina del Rey, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAY H GELLER
JAY H GELLER JAY H GELLER PCWEST TWR STE 4000 2425 W OLYMPIC BLSANTA MONICA, CA 90404UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Nutritional and dietary supplements, acne treatment preparations, and over-the-counter pharmaceuticals, namely diuretics, weight loss preparations, appetite suppressants, antacids, anti-flatulents, laxatives, antidiarrheal preparations, nightime sleep aids, stimulants, preparations to relieve the symptoms of coughs, colds, and flu, nasal decongestants, antitussives, antihistamines, analgesics, antirheumatics, antipyretics, digestive aids, interal deodorant preparations, preparations to relieve the symptoms of premenstrual syndrome and menopause, medicated body cleansers and moisturizers, medicated hair shampoo and conditioner, acne treatment and prevention preparations, antiseptics and anti-microbial preparations, antifungals, first aid antiseptics and antibiotics, anticaries preparations, hemorhoid treatment preparations, internal and external preparations to relieve itching, medicated skin protectant preparations | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 2, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 2, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 8, 2007 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 8, 2007 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 23, 2007 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 23, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 16, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 16, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 26, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 5, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 4, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 4, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 9, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 9, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 26, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 1, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 12, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 2, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 1, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 24, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 21, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 21, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 21, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 21, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 16, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 16, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 16, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 16, 2004 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 16, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 14, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 14, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 2, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 2, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 25, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 23, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 10, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |