USPTO serial 78361372
BRITNEY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARROLL, DORITT
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BRITNEY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
BRAD D. ROSE
BRAD D ROSE PRYOR CASHMAN SHERMAN & FLYNN LLP410 PARK AVE FL 10NEW YORK, NY 10022-4441UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cosmetics; cosmetic and make up products, namely, makeup, facial makeup, concealers, blushers, facial powders, foundation makeup, eye makeup, eye pencils, eyebrow pencils, mascara, false eyelashes, compacts containing makeup, cosmetic pencils, lipstick, lip gloss, lip pomades, lip pencils, makeup removers, eye creams, facial cleansers, toners, facial exfoliants and scrubs, facial creams, facial moisturizers, facial lotions, non-medicated facial treatments in the nature of skin moisturizing creams and cleansers, non-medicated lip care preparations, lip cream, cosmetic pads, makeup applicators in the nature of cotton swabs for cosmetic purposes, pre-moistened cosmetic wipes, pre-moistened cosmetic tissues and towelettes, cotton sticks for cosmetic purposes, all purpose cotton swabs for personal use and cosmetic purposes; fragrance products, namely, perfume, cologne, eau de toilette, eau de perfume, eau de cologne and toilette water; skin care products, namely, skin moisturizers and skin moisturizer masks, skin conditioners, hand creams, skin cleansers, and wrinkle removing skin care preparations; non-medicated topical skin creams, ointments, gels, toners, lotions, sprays and powders; aromatherapy creams, lotions and oils; body and beauty care products, namely, body and beauty care preparations, massage oils, essential oils for personal use, talcum powder, bath beads, bath crystals, bath foam, bath gels, bath oils, bath powders, bath salts, face wash, body scrubs, body fragrances, body and hand lotions, body gels, shower gels, body oils, body powders, body exfoliants, body masks, body mask creams and lotions, shaving preparations, after shave lotions, shaving balm, shaving cream, shaving gel, skin abrasive preparations, non-medicated skin creams, and skin lotions for relieving razor bums; suncare products, namely, sunscreen preparations, suntanning preparations and after-sun lotions; self-tanning preparations, namely, self tanning milk and cream, accelerated tanning cream, self-tanning lotions, gels and sprays; nail care products, namely, nail care preparations, nail polishes, nail polish base coat, nail polish top coat, nail strengtheners, nail hardeners, nail polish removers, nail creams, cuticle removing preparations, nail tips, and nail buffing preparations; hair care products, namely,shampoos, conditioners, mousse, gels, frosts, creams, rinses, sprays, hair color, hair waving lotion, permanent wave preparations, hair lighteners, hair dyes, hair emollients, hair mascara, hair pomades, hair color removers, hair relaxing preparations, hair styling preparations, hair removing cream, and hair care preparations | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 20, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 20, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 18, 2008 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 18, 2008 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 14, 2008 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 14, 2008 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 14, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 14, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 27, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 27, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 5, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 13, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 13, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Sep 13, 2006 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 5, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 21, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 27, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 7, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 3, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 28, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 25, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 24, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 7, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 7, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 18, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 17, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 17, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 1, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 1, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 24, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 24, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 12, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |