USPTO serial 78361436
TEASERS BABES & BOYS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3238806Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 8, 2007
- Examiner
- JACKSON, STEVEN W
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with TEASERS BABES & BOYS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Van Baak Horeca Service Holding B.V.
Amsterdam, NL
Other trademarks owned by Van Baak Horeca Service Holding B.V.
Van Baak Horeca Service Holding B.V.
Amsterdam, NL
Other trademarks owned by Van Baak Horeca Service Holding B.V.
Van Baak Horeca Service Holding B.V.
Amsterdam, NL
Other trademarks owned by Van Baak Horeca Service Holding B.V.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jess M. Collen
JESS M COLLEN COLLEN IP, INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW, PTHE HOLYOKE-MANHATTAN BLDG 80 SOSSINING, NY 10562UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing, namely, shirts, t-shirts, sweatshirts, polo shirts, underwear, string bikinis, boxer shorts, tops, socks, sport pants, shorts, skirts, trousers, caps, and hats | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 1, 2003 |
| 035 | Franchising, namely, consultation and assistance in business management, organization and promotion in the hotel and catering industry; business and administrative management within the framework of franchise companies in the hotel and catering industry; business assistance and consultancy, namely, business management of companies in the hotel and catering industry | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 1, 2003 |
| 041 | Night clubs; meeting, seminar and conference arranging; party planning | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 1, 2003 |
| 043 | Services of a café, restaurant and hotel; catering services; services of bars; services for the reservation of rooms; provision of meeting, seminar and conference facilities, on a temporary basis | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 1, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Van Baak Horeca Service Holding B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Van Baak Horeca Service Holding B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Van Baak Horeca Service Holding B.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 043
- Similar marks named TEASERS BABES & BOYS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 13, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 8, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 26, 2006 | CHPB | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Sep 26, 2006 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Sep 25, 2006 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 22, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 4, 2006 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 11, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 21, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 22, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 12, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 10, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 27, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 7, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 7, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 15, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 15, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 30, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 12, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 12, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 10, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 11, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 10, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 10, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 17, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 22, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 22, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 27, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 12, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |