USPTO serial 78361726
GOLFER'S CHOICE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 24, 2007
- Examiner
- GILBERT, REBECCA L
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with GOLFER'S CHOICE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $1,097*
Plus Government fees of $1,950
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Industry, CA, US
Pomona, CA, US
Industry, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John D. McConaghy
John D. McConaghy Karish & Bjorgum, PC119 E. Union St., Suite BPasadena, CA 91103UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Golf accessories for carrying golf sporting articles, namely, automobile trunk organizers for golf sporting articles | ACTIVE | Feb 11, 2005 |
| 018 | Bags for carrying golf shoes; bags for carrying golf sporting personal amenities, sold empty | ACTIVE | Feb 11, 2005 |
| 028 | Golf bags; golf accessories, namely, golf accessory bags, golf caddy bags, non-motorized travel golf caddies in the nature of wheeled carts, golf ball pouches, golf bag covers | ACTIVE | Feb 11, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Yang, Roger
- Other trademarks owned by Yang, Roger
- Other trademarks owned by Yang, Roger
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named GOLFER'S CHOICE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 24, 2026 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2021 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Dec 18, 2021 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 18, 2021 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 18, 2021 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 18, 2021 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 1, 2017 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 1, 2017 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Sep 1, 2017 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Aug 31, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 21, 2017 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 24, 2016 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 10, 2013 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2013 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jul 10, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 24, 2013 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 26, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 26, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 24, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 10, 2007 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 10, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 23, 2007 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 23, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 13, 2007 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 22, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2007 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Nov 24, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 10, 2006 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Nov 10, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 10, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 7, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 7, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 7, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 2, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 7, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 13, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 5, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 23, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 19, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 14, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 11, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 11, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 3, 2005 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 27, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 22, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 22, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 22, 2005 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 21, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 21, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 21, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 22, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 22, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 9, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 4, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 1, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 1, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 28, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 28, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 1, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 31, 2004 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 25, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 12, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |