USPTO serial 78361740
SECURESCOUT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 18, 2008
- Examiner
- PHAM, LANA H
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SECURESCOUT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
DAI NIPPON INSATSU KABUSHIKI KAISHA
SHINJUKU-KU, TOKYO, JP
Other trademarks owned by DAI NIPPON INSATSU KABUSHIKI KAISHA
Kita-Ku, Tokyo, JP
Tokyo, JP
Tokyo, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jill Anderfuren
Jill Anderfuren Marshall, Gerstein & Borun LLP233 South Wacker Drive63rd FloorChicago, IL 60606Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | [Computer software for word processing and for use as a spreadsheet; computer software for use in financial accounting, sales force automation, supply chain management, customer relationship management and enterprise resource planning; database management software for use in the field of human resources; computer software for use in capturing, organizing and sharing online content and for use in database management;] computer software for use in preventing penetration of the security of the computer networks; computers and electronic technology, namely, personal computer, personal digital assistance, portable mp3 [player, digital camera, image scanner, digital printer, circuit board, hard disk drive, optical disc drive, memory card, local area network computer cards for connecting portable computer devices to computer networks and modem; computer hardware] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 1, 2004 |
| 042 | [Creation and design of computer software for others;] maintenance of computer software[; design of computers for others; leasing of computers] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 1, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by DAI NIPPON INSATSU KABUSHIKI KAISHA
- Other trademarks owned by Nexantis Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Nexantis Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Nexantis Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named SECURESCOUT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 19, 2018 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Mar 18, 2017 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2014 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2014 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Mar 28, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 13, 2014 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2014 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 13, 2014 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 13, 2014 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 8, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 3, 2012 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Aug 3, 2012 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 19, 2009 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 19, 2009 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 18, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 11, 2008 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 11, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 9, 2008 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 7, 2007 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 9, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 7, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 8, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 13, 2007 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 28, 2006 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 29, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 9, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 8, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 7, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 30, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 27, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 26, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 26, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 4, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 4, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 22, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 21, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 21, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 21, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 20, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 4, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 4, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 2, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 2, 2004 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 25, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 12, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |