USPTO serial 78361958
FENG SHUI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DWYER, JOHN D
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FENG SHUI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CHRISTOPHER J. HAYES,
ROBERT G LANCASTER BRYAN CAVE LLP211 N BROADWAY STE 3600SAINT LOUIS, MO 63102UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 024 | Afghans, cloth banners, barbecue mitts, bath linen, bed blankets, bed canopies, bed linen, bed pads, bed sheets, bed spreads, billiard cloth, textile printers' blankets, bolting cloth, fabric for boots and shoes, brocade, buckram, crib bumpers, cloth bunting, calico, crib canopies, fabric cascades, pillowcases, cheese cloth, chenille fabric, cheviot fabric, crepe cloth, felt cloth, flax cloth, glass cloth, hemp cloth, jute cloth, sail cloth, silk cloth, woolen cloth, cloth doilies, cloth flags, cloth labels, cloth napkins for removing makeup, textile used as lining for clothing, dishcloths, oil cloths, wash cloths, table cloths not of paper, cloth coasters, comforters, cotton fabric, duvet covers, mattress covers, unfitted fabric furniture covers, covers for cushions, curtain fabric, net curtains, window curtains, curtains, damask, dimity, draperies, dust ruffles, duvets, eiderdown quilts, esparto fabric, gauze fabric, nylon fabric, polyester fabric, ramie fabric, rayon fabric, upholstery fabric, woolen fabric, zephyr fabric, silk fabric for printing patterns, linen lining fabric for shoes, fiberglass fabric for textile use, fabric of imitation animal skin, fabric table runners, flannel, frieze, fustian, textile linings for garments, golf towels, handkerchiefs, potholders, jersey fabric material, kitchen towels, household linen, table linen, textile place mats, table mats not of paper, mattress pads, oven mitts, washing mitts, mole skin, mosquito nets, textile napkins, textile napkins for removing makeup, rags for paper making, cloth pennants, pillow shams, window treatment poufs, printed textile labels, window treatment puffs, quilts, sackcloth, shams, shower curtains, shrouds, window treatment swags, taffeta, textile tapestries, textile wall hangings, tea towels, towels, tulle, fabric valances, velvet, zephyr cloth | ACTIVE | — |
| 027 | Fabric bath mats and textile bath mats | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 31, 2006 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 31, 2006 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 31, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 31, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 2, 2006 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Apr 10, 2006 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2006 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 13, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 28, 2005 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 2, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 2, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 20, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 19, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 19, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 1, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 10, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 10, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 23, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 6, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 6, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 28, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 28, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 27, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 27, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 5, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 5, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 25, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 12, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |