USPTO serial 78362204
JUICE BOX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STIGLITZ, SUSAN R
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with JUICE BOX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Device for supplying Power over Ethernet according to IEEE 802;3af Standard; namely hubs that provide power to computer networks through an Ethernet infrastructure, allowing power to be supplied to end devices, such as Wireless Access Points or Voice over Internet telephones, directly through existing LAN cables; and expressly excluding power transfer pedestals; namely transfer points between commercial AC and emergency generator power | ABANDONED | May 21, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 27, 2008 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 27, 2008 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 27, 2008 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 15, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 5, 2007 | ABND | ABANDONMENT DELETED BY TTAB | — |
| May 14, 2007 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 2, 2006 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 2, 2006 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 2, 2006 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 2, 2006 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 23, 2005 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 14, 2005 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 28, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 8, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 16, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 11, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 8, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 8, 2005 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 3, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 8, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 8, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 27, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 27, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 29, 2004 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 11, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 11, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 11, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2004 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 12, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |