USPTO serial 78362580
BOUNCY BABY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KHAN, ASMAT A
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BOUNCY BABY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | ACTION FIGURES; ACTION FIGURE PLAYING ENVIRONMENTS; ACTION SKILL GAMES; ARCADE GAMES; BALLOONS; BASEBALLS; BASEBALL GLOVES; BASKETBALLS; BEACH BALLS; BEAN BAG DOLLS; BOARD GAMES; BODY BOARDS; CARD GAMES; CHILDREN'S PLAY COSMETICS; CHRISTMAS TREE ORNAMENTS, EXCEPT CONFECTIONERY OR ILLUMINATION ARTICLES; CRAFT SETS FOR DECORATING BALLOONS; FLYING DISCS; FOOTBALLS; HAND HELD UNIT FOR PLAYING ELECTRONIC GAMES; IN-LINE SKATES; KITES; MOBILES FOR CHILDREN; PARTY FAVORS IN THE NATURE OF CRACKERS AND NOISEMAKERS; PLAYGROUND BALLS; PLAYING CARDS; PLUSH TOYS; PUPPETS; PUZZLES; ROLLER SKATES; SLEDS; SOCCER BALLS; SWIM FLOATS FOR RECREATIONAL USE; SWIM FINS; TOY ACTION FIGURES AND ACESSORIES THEREFOR; TOYS, GAMES AND PLAYTHINGS, NAMELY, DOLLS, DOLL CLOTHING, DOLL ACCESSORIES, TOY VEHICLES AND PLAYSETS; TOY SCOOTERS WATER WING SWIM AIDS FOR RECREATIONAL USE; WIND-UP TOYS; AND YO-YOS | ACTIVE | Jul 1, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 22, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 22, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 7, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 6, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 3, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 18, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 16, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 10, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 1, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 1, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 30, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 13, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |