Drawing for STAN

USPTO serial 78362851

STAN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RINGLE, JAMES W
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with STAN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James A. Zellinger

JAMES A ZELLINGER SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION INC410 SWING RDGREENSBORO, NC 27409UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Advertising and business consultancy in the fields of agriculture, horticulture, forestry, market-gardening, fruit growing, seed planting, growing and protection of seedsACTIVE—
042Scientific and technological research, namely, research in the fields of agriculture, horticulture, forestry, market-gardening, fruit growing, growing and protection of seeds and animal nutrition; Computer software design and development of computer programs and software for others in the fields of agriculture, horticulture, forestry, market-gardening, fruit growing, growing and protection of seeds; Consulting services relating to quality control and quality insurance, both in the fields of agriculture, horticulture, forestry, market-gardening, fruit growing, seed planting, growing and protection of seeds and animal nutrition; Scientific, technological or technical services and advice relating to the growing of plants and crop protection; advice on weather conditionsACTIVE—
044Agriculture, horticulture and forestry services, namely, providing advice on plant growth; Providing a database on the global computer network which provides information in the fields of agriculture, horticulture, forestry, market-gardening, fruit growing, growing and protection of seeds and animal nutrition; Agricultural advice; Horticultural services; Forestry services, namely, vermin exterminating; Consulting services in the field of crop protection management and crop solutions; consulting services in the field of crop protection and pest controlACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 12, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 7, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 28, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 28, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 28, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 29, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 6, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 17, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 20, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 14, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 10, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Apr 7, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 7, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Apr 7, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 7, 2006ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Mar 24, 2006PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Mar 3, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 24, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 22, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Feb 22, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 22, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 22, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 21, 2006ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jan 27, 2006PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Jan 11, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 5, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 14, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 14, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 21, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 21, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 15, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 9, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 8, 2004CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Nov 5, 2004CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Oct 21, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 7, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 7, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 31, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 29, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 13, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance