Drawing for EL GRAN MATADOR

USPTO serial 78364023

EL GRAN MATADOR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
โ€”
Examiner
WOOD, CAROLINE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EL GRAN MATADOR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lawrence E. Abelman

LAWRENCE E ABELMAN ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB666 3RD AVE 10TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033TEQUILAACTIVEโ€”

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited ยง2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 1, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 1, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 6, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILEDโ€”
Sep 5, 2012EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTEDโ€”
Aug 31, 2012EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILEDโ€”
Aug 31, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 8, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILEDโ€”
Mar 7, 2012EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTEDโ€”
Mar 2, 2012EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILEDโ€”
Mar 2, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 8, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILEDโ€”
Sep 7, 2011EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTEDโ€”
Sep 2, 2011EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILEDโ€”
Sep 2, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 12, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILEDโ€”
Mar 11, 2011EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTEDโ€”
Mar 10, 2011AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGALโ€”
Mar 1, 2011EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILEDโ€”
Mar 1, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 4, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILEDโ€”
Sep 2, 2010EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTEDโ€”
Sep 2, 2010EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILEDโ€”
Sep 2, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 2, 2010NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline โ€” usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 8, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 18, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATIONโ€”
Nov 5, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETEDโ€”
Nov 5, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIEโ€”
Oct 27, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTERโ€”
Sep 28, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDEDโ€”
Mar 23, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDEDโ€”
Sep 22, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDEDโ€”
Mar 21, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDEDโ€”
Sep 4, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDEDโ€”
Jan 5, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDEDโ€”
Jan 5, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIEโ€”
Jun 13, 2006CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILEDโ€”
Jun 12, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTENโ€”
May 23, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTEREDโ€”
May 1, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICEโ€”
May 1, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVEDโ€”
Mar 14, 2006CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTEREDโ€”
Feb 7, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVEDโ€”
Nov 9, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 8, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 13, 2005RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTIONโ€”
Apr 12, 2005CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILEDโ€”
Apr 11, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTENโ€”
Mar 30, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTEREDโ€”
Mar 14, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICEโ€”
Mar 14, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVEDโ€”
Sep 7, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 7, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 30, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINERโ€”
Feb 18, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTEREDโ€”

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance