USPTO serial 78364467
BOOTBAG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAYERSCHOFF, GLENN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BOOTBAG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
NEW YORK, NY
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | PRODUCTS IN LEATHER AND IMITATION LEATHER, NAMELY-- LEATHER KEY HOLDERS, SATCHELS, HANDBAGS, RUCKSACKS, TRUNKS AND LUGGAGE, MONEY BAGS, TRAVELING BAGS AND LUGGAGE, LEATHER POUCHES, ATTACHE CASES, SMALL MAKEUP CASES SOLD EMPTY, SMALL CASES FOR DOCUMENTS,TRAVELING CASES, TOILET AND MAKEUP CASES SOLD EMPTY, PURSES, WALLETS, BRIEF CASES, DOCUMENT CASES, BUSINESS CARD CASES, ATHLETIC BAGS; ATTACHE CASES; BABY CARRIERS WORN ON THE BODY; BACKPACKS; BEACH BAGS; BILLFOLDS; BOOK BAGS; BRIEFCASE-TYPE PORTFOLIOS; CARRY-ON BAGS; NON-MOTORIZED COLLAPSIBLE LUGGAGE CARTS; CHANGE PURSES; CLUTCH BAGS; CLUTCH PURSES; COIN PURSES; COSMETIC CASES SOLD EMPTY; CREDIT CARD CASES; DIAPER BAGS; DRAWSTRING POUCHES; DUFFEL BAGS; FANNY PACKS; FELT POUCHES; GARMENT BAGS FOR TRAVEL; GYM BAGS; HAT BOXES FOR TRAVEL; KEY CASES; KNAPSACKS; OVERNIGHT BAGS; OVERNIGHT CASES; PASSPORT CASES, PASSPORT HOLDERS; POCKETBOOKS; PURSES; SCHOOL BAGS; SHOE BAGS FOR TRAVEL; LEATHER SHOPPING BAGS; MESH SHOPPING BAGS; TEXTILE SHOPPING BAGS; SHOULDER BAGS; ALL-PURPOSE SPORTS BAGS; SPORTSMAN'S HUNTING BAGS; SUITCASES; TOTE BAGS; TRUNKS FOR TRAVELING; VALISES; VANITY CASES SOLD EMPTY; WAIST PACKS; WALLETS | ACTIVE | Oct 1, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 20, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 20, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 24, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 24, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 24, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 21, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 21, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 20, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 19, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 16, 2005 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Sep 8, 2005 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Sep 8, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 30, 2005 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 30, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 17, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 17, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 2, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 1, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 1, 2004 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 31, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 10, 2004 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 28, 2004 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 2, 2004 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 20, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |