USPTO serial 78365236
KTA QUALITY AND INTEGRITY SINCE 1949
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3204961Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 6, 2007
- Examiner
- REGAN, JOHN B
- Law office
- —
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with KTA QUALITY AND INTEGRITY SINCE 1949?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Pittsburgh, PA
Pittsburgh, PA
Pittsburgh, PA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Rebecca A. Bowman
KTA-Tator, Inc.115 Technology DrivePittsburgh, PA 15275-1085UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | technical construction-related consultation in the fields of paint, coatings and linings, erection and rehabilitation of mechanical equipment, namely cranes, and metal and concrete structures, namely bridges, docks, piers, and water tanks, that are subject to hostile environments; inspection in the course of construction of structures, namely bridges, docks, and piers and water tanks, that are subject to hostile environments; technical construction supervision and construction inspection in the fields of paint, coatings and linings application, namely inspection during pre-construction steel fabrication to ensure compliance with weld standards, inspection during erection and rehabilitation to ensure compliance with construction standards, and supervision of air barrier installation to ensure compliance with safety design standards | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 1, 1982 |
| 042 | technical consultation in the fields of protection of the environment from construction debris and installation of air barrier technologies; inspection in the course of construction of equipment, namely cranes, that are subject to hostile environments; oversight during construction to ensure compliance with environmental requirements; inspection in the fields of paint, coatings and linings application, namely inspection during erection and rehabilitation to ensure compliance with construction standards, and supervision of air barrier installation to ensure compliance with environmental standards; engineering services; technical consultation in the field of environmental protection, namely reviewing standards and practices to assure compliance with environmental laws and regulations; inspection services in the field of equipment; technology supervision and inspection in the fields of paint, coatings and linings application; chemical and mechanical laboratory services; laboratory research in the fields of paint/coatings linings analysis, advanced analytical and physical testing of materials performance, and environmental testing | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 1, 1982 |
| 045 | consultation services in the field of the safety needs of commercial and industrial companies | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 1, 1982 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by KTA-Tator, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by KTA-Tator, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by KTA-Tator, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named KTA QUALITY AND INTEGRITY SINCE 1949
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 25, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 11, 2012 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Apr 11, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 22, 2012 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 22, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 6, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 21, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 1, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 28, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 18, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 3, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 1, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 1, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 1, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 31, 2006 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 26, 2006 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jul 21, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 19, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 27, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 15, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 8, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 8, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 7, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 7, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 7, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 22, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 9, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 9, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 13, 2005 | GRML | CORRESPONDENCE E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2005 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 29, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 22, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 22, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 22, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 19, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 15, 2005 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2005 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Aug 30, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 4, 2005 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 18, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 16, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 13, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 13, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 2, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 22, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |