USPTO serial 78365483
INFONE 411
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EULIN, INGRID C
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with INFONE 411?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Beaverton, OR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Beth M. Goldman
BETH M GOLDMAN HELLER EHRMAN WHITE MCAULIFFE LLP333 BUSH STSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94104-2878UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Providing a computerized database of information about individuals' and/or businesses' preferences regarding preferred methods of call handling and message returning; telecommunications services, namely, local, long distance, and international voice, text, facsimile and data telecommunications services; electronic mail and voice mail and messaging services; computer aided transmission of messages; 800 telecommunications services; location independent personal communications services comprising mobile, voice, data, and facsimile services; telecommunications services, namely, the electronic transmission and reception of voice, data, electronic mail, news, facsimiles and information and a broad range of consumer services; connecting callers to desired numbers requested through directory assistance services via live telephone operators; establishing communication between a user and a system that is remote from the user; connecting a user with live operators or automated menus at any time during a communication; automatically connecting a user with live operators or automated menus when communication cannot be completed; providing telephone numbers called to a user; recording and transmission of voice and text messages, including stored messages, regarding products, services, events, activities, attractions and facilities in particular geographic locations | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 19, 2007 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Jan 19, 2007 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2007 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 24, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 11, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 11, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 20, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 20, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 14, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 4, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 24, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 24, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 10, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 1, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 23, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |