Drawing for LIVING WELL WITH COPD

USPTO serial 78365546

LIVING WELL WITH COPD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
MCDOWELL, MATTHEW J
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LIVING WELL WITH COPD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Martin J. Beran

MARTIN J BERAN OSTROLENK, FABER, GERB & SOFFEN LLP1180 AVENUE OF THE AMERICAS 7TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009pre-recorded video tapes featuring educational information about pharmaceuticals and pre-recorded compact discs containing educational software featuring instruction in therapeutic pulmonary treatmentsACTIVE
016printed matter related to the medical and pharmaceutical field, namely newspapers, magazines, newsletters, brochures, pamphlets, books and journals, dictionaries and instructional and teaching materials in the field of respiratory diseasesACTIVE
042research services in the medical and pharmaceutical fieldACTIVE
044medical services, namely providing medical and pharmaceutical informationACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 29, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 29, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 24, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Jul 7, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Jul 7, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Feb 17, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 10, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 18, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 28, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jul 11, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jul 11, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jul 6, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jul 5, 2005ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
Jun 24, 2005CWBPWITHDRAWN BEFORE PUBLICATION
Apr 12, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Apr 8, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Apr 7, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Apr 6, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Apr 6, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Mar 15, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 15, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Mar 11, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 11, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Feb 9, 2005CPRAPRIORITY ACTION MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Feb 8, 2005CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jan 13, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Dec 28, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 28, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Sep 7, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 7, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 1, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 23, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance