Drawing for DIAMONICE

USPTO serial 78365990

DIAMONICE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
RINGLE, JAMES W
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with DIAMONICE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John D. Cromie

John D. Cromie, Esq. Connell Foley LLP85 Livingston AvenueRoseland, NJ 07068UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
014Jewelry with or without precious, semiprecious, simulated or synthetic stonesABANDONED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 4, 2007MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION
Dec 4, 2007ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION
Sep 11, 2007OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999
Sep 13, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 13, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Jan 5, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jan 4, 2005OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999
Jan 3, 2005OPPFOPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB
Dec 14, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 24, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Oct 6, 2004PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Oct 5, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Sep 6, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Sep 2, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 23, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance