USPTO serial 78367357
GRANDPARENTS MAGAZINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 17, 2005
- Examiner
- LORENZO, ROBERT
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with GRANDPARENTS MAGAZINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
SEATTLE, WA
NEW YORK, NY
Wayne, PA
Wayne, PA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Rachel J. Lin
Docketing Sills Cummis & Gross P.C.30 Rockefeller Plaza29th Floor, IP Dept.New York, NY 10112Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Providing on-line general feature magazines for grandparents | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 3, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by NORWESTECH, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by GRANDPARENTS.COM, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Wester, Katrina Hayday
- Other trademarks owned by Wester, Katrina Hayday
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named GRANDPARENTS MAGAZINE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 5, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 29, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 18, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 18, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 6, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 17, 2005 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Feb 19, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 7, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 4, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 31, 2005 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 31, 2005 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 27, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 27, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 27, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 27, 2005 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 17, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 17, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2005 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 14, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 3, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 26, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |