USPTO serial 78368000
EFFICIENT MICROBES (EM)
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 29, 2005
- Examiner
- ELTON, DAVID JONATHAN
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EFFICIENT MICROBES (EM)?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Sustainable Community Development, L.L.C.
Kansas City, KS
Other trademarks owned by Sustainable Community Development, L.L.C.
Sustainable Community Development, L.L.C.
Kansas City, KS
Other trademarks owned by Sustainable Community Development, L.L.C.
Sustainable Community Development, L.L.C.
Kansas City, KS
Other trademarks owned by Sustainable Community Development, L.L.C.
KANSAS CITY, MO
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kimberly A. Wingate
KIMBERLY A WINGATE LATHROP & GAGE LC2345 GRAND BLVD.SUITE 2800KANAS CITY, KS 64108-2684Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Probiotic all-purpose cultures used for human health; probiotic all-purpose cultures used for animal health and agricultural and environmental applications | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | Feb 12, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Sustainable Community Development, L.L.C.
- Other trademarks owned by Sustainable Community Development, L.L.C.
- Other trademarks owned by Sustainable Community Development, L.L.C.
- Other trademarks owned by BIOSYNTROPY SOLUTIONS LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Similar marks named EFFICIENT MICROBES (EM)
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 5, 2008 | C7.. | CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL | — |
| Aug 26, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 12, 2008 | C7RF | REQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 21, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 29, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 6, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 29, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 25, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 25, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 17, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 18, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 6, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 2, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 2, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 31, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 21, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 21, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 23, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 23, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 13, 2004 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Sep 13, 2004 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 4, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 20, 2004 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Apr 20, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 19, 2004 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 19, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 26, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |