USPTO serial 78368566
WHAT WERE THEY THINKING?
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3325631Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 30, 2007
- Examiner
- LEVINE, HOWARD B
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with WHAT WERE THEY THINKING??
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Beverly Hills, CA
Upland, CA
Upland, CA
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | board games | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 6, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Lyons, Milton D.
- Other trademarks owned by Zakich, Dean L.
- Other trademarks owned by Zakich, Dean L.
- Other trademarks owned by MR. MILTON D. LYONS
- Other trademarks owned by MR. MILTON D. LYONS
- Other trademarks owned by Lyons, Milton D.
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named WHAT WERE THEY THINKING?
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 6, 2014 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 30, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 23, 2007 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 23, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 20, 2007 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 10, 2007 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 6, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2007 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jan 31, 2007 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2007 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Jan 3, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 7, 2006 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2006 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 19, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 31, 2006 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Oct 31, 2006 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 25, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 19, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 5, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 18, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 15, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 13, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 16, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 16, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 19, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 25, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 5, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 23, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 27, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 15, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 15, 2004 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 6, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 6, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 6, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 27, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |