Drawing for STEALTH LIMBSAVER

USPTO serial 78369067

STEALTH LIMBSAVER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CLARKE, NANCY
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - MANAGING ATTORNEY

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with STEALTH LIMBSAVER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Richard D. Multer

Richard D. Multer Law Office of Richard D. Multer50 W. Rose Nye Wayn/aShelton, WA 98584

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028Archery ProductsACTIVEJan 7, 2002

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 9, 2008CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jul 9, 2008COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jul 8, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 11, 2005MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Jan 11, 2005ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Sep 11, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 11, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 7, 2004LOAPLETTER OF ABANDONMENT PROCESSED—
Sep 7, 2004FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Sep 7, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 2, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 12, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 1, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance