USPTO serial 78369818
WHAT DOES YOUR LOO SAY ABOUT YOU?
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CAPSHAW, DANIEL
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WHAT DOES YOUR LOO SAY ABOUT YOU??
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert A. Hyde
Robert A. Hyde Reckitt Benckiser Inc.399 Interpace ParkwayParsippany, NJ 07054UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Bleaching preparations for household use; general purpose cleaning, polishing, scouring and abrasive liquids and powder; drain and sink cleaning liquids and powders; lime scale removers, rust removers, decalcifying and descaling preparations for household use; soaps, anti-bacterial soaps | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | Chemical preparations for sanitary use; all purpose disinfectant; disinfectant bathroom and toilet bowl cleaners, anti-bacterial cleaners; air fresheners; fungicides for domestic use | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Linden Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Linden Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by RECKITT BENCKISER INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Similar marks named WHAT DOES YOUR LOO SAY ABOUT YOU?
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 17, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 16, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 7, 2008 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 30, 2008 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 26, 2008 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 7, 2008 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 12, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 13, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 14, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 5, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 27, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 20, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 22, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 17, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 25, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 5, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 5, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 29, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 27, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 8, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 5, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 5, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 13, 2005 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| May 25, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 13, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 13, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 11, 2005 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 11, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 3, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 25, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 25, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 25, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 25, 2005 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 14, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 8, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 2, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |