Drawing for ASEPSYS

USPTO serial 78369976

ASEPSYS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
ESTRADA, LINDA M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ASEPSYS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stephen A. Slusher

STEPHEN A SLUSHER PEACOCK, MYERS & ADAMS PCPO BOX 26927ALBUQUERQUE, NM 87125-6927UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Ultraviolet sterilizer for non-medical purposes and sanitizing apparatus in the nature of a non-medical sanitizer for use in the sterilization and sanitizing of bedding, comforters, linens, pillow cases, sheets, and bedspreads, and chair cushions, carpet, curtains, telephones, desktops, countertops, soap dishes, drinking glasses, cups, dishes, shower curtains, towels, bathmats, tile flooring, shower surrounds, coffeemakers, table linens, and audiovisual remote control devices; and ultraviolet air purifierACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 10, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 10, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 31, 2006EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Oct 31, 2006EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Oct 31, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 19, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Jan 19, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Jan 19, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 1, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 9, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 20, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Apr 15, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Apr 13, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Mar 18, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Mar 18, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Nov 16, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 16, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 20, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Sep 16, 2004GNPEEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED
Sep 16, 2004CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED
Sep 8, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 3, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance