Drawing for Serial No. 78370699

USPTO serial 78370699

Serial No. 78370699

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
FRENCH, CURTIS W
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 78370699?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
008Police batonsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 23, 2015ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 23, 2015REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Apr 19, 2007MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT
Apr 19, 2007ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED
Apr 18, 2007EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED
Apr 13, 2007GNSFSUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED
Apr 13, 2007CFRCSUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN
Feb 22, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Feb 22, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jan 25, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 25, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jul 17, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 17, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 14, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
May 8, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 8, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Mar 29, 2006GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 29, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 24, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Feb 3, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 3, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Nov 2, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 2, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 12, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Jul 18, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 18, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Feb 17, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 17, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 22, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Dec 3, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 3, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Sep 10, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 10, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 9, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 4, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance