USPTO serial 78371264
CHAR-BROIL CLASSIC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LOUGHRAN, BARBARA
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CHAR-BROIL CLASSIC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James W. Kayden
JAMES W KAYDEN THOMAS, KAYDEN, HORSTEMEYER & RISLEY, LL100 GALLERIA PKWY NW STE 1750ATLANTA, GA 30339UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Gas, electric and charcoal barbecue grills; smoker grills; barbecue grill burners; outdoor fireplaces and repair and replacement parts therefore | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Utensils for barbecues, namely, spatulas, forks, and tongs; brushes for basting meat and other barbecued foods; brushes for cleaning barbecue grills and grates; barbecue grill burner covers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by W.C. Bradley Company
- Other trademarks owned by W.C. Bradley Company
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named CHAR-BROIL CLASSIC
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 7, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 7, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 4, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 12, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 22, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 11, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 8, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 31, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 29, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 16, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 16, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 24, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 8, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |