USPTO serial 78372025
CELLARWORKS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 10, 2006
- Examiner
- AIKENS, RONALD E
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with CELLARWORKS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*
Plus Government fees of $850
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Brooklyn, NY
Brooklyn, NY
New York, NY
BEVERLY HILLS, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Design of wine cellars, wine storage systems, and wine cellar related items, namely, wine racks, wine cellar cooling units, and wine collections; interior decorating and interior decorating consultation in the fields of wine cellars, wine storage systems, and wine cellar related items, namely, wine racks, wine cellar cooling units | ACTIVE | Jan 15, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Cellarworks, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Cellarworks, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Cellarworks, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by LUCA SP ENTERPRISES LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named CELLARWORKS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 10, 2025 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2025 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 7, 2016 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2016 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Nov 7, 2016 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Nov 4, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 23, 2016 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 10, 2015 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2012 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2012 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Apr 20, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 4, 2012 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 4, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 10, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 18, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 28, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 25, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 19, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 12, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 11, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 3, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 3, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 5, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 4, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 3, 2006 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 2, 2006 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Mar 1, 2006 | UNDC | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 24, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 21, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 21, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 21, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 23, 2006 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 23, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 30, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 6, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 6, 2005 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Dec 6, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 6, 2005 | UNDC | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 8, 2005 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2005 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 4, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 4, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 9, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 2, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 2, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 2, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 22, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 22, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 24, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 11, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 8, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |