Drawing for I2 FACETS XR (NOTE, DOES NOT SHOW SUPERSCRIPT)

USPTO serial 78372151

I2 FACETS XR (NOTE, DOES NOT SHOW SUPERSCRIPT)

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
VERHOSEK, WILLIAM T
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with I2 FACETS XR (NOTE, DOES NOT SHOW SUPERSCRIPT)?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Donald W. Margolis

DONALD W MARGOLIS MARGOLIS & ASSOCIATESPO BOX 20338BOULDER, CO 80308-3338UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Application service provider (ASP) featuring software in the field of healthcare information technology services; and computer software services, namely providing temporary non-downloadable computer software that generates data management information to healthcare organizations; and providing rental of software for the sameACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 27, 2005MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT
Oct 27, 2005ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED
Oct 26, 2005EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED
Oct 21, 2005GRMLCORRESPONDENCE E-MAILED
Oct 21, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 21, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Oct 10, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 10, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 8, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 8, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 28, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Mar 14, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 14, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 13, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 13, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 13, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 9, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance