CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for DELITE BITES

USPTO serial 78372280

DELITE BITES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3067446Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 14, 2006
Examiner
BRACEY, KAREN
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with DELITE BITES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Roger H. Bora

Roger H. Bora Thompson Hine LLP10050 Innovation Drive, Suite 400Dayton, OH 45342-4934UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Processed poultry and processed meat, namely, beef and porkSECTION 8 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 21, 2016CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
Mar 14, 2015REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
Oct 17, 2012ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Sep 17, 2012NA85NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Sep 17, 2012C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Sep 17, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Aug 22, 2012E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED—
Dec 15, 2010ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Oct 20, 2010ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Oct 13, 2010ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jan 21, 2010ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Oct 14, 2009ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Oct 7, 2009ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jan 14, 2009ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Dec 24, 2008ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Mar 14, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 20, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 30, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 2, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 28, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 27, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 27, 2005IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Oct 25, 2005AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Oct 21, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 13, 2005IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Oct 13, 2005EAAUTEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED—
Oct 11, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 11, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 11, 2005GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 11, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 24, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 14, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 14, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 13, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 13, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 13, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 9, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance