Drawing for EL PODER DE LA IMAGINACIÓN

USPTO serial 78372872

EL PODER DE LA IMAGINACIÓN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
BENZMILLER, ANDREW
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with EL PODER DE LA IMAGINACIÓN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kathryn Barrett Park

KATHRYN BARRETT PARK GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY3135 EASTON TPKEFAIRFIELD, CT 68280002UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Electric and wind-powered electric generators; aeronautical and aeroplane engines; control mechanisms for machines, engines or motors; motors and engines for boats; dishwashers; garbage and waste disposals; motors; engines; starters for motors and engines; laundry washing machines; laundry drying machines; coffee grinders; blenders; bread making machines; vacuum cleaners; food dehydrators; compressors; turbo compressors; fuel injectors and turbochargers for machines, motors and engines; wind, steam, gas and hydraulic turbines; electric pumps; valves for pumps; electric food blenders; electric can openers; food processors; electric juice makers and juice extractors, and component parts of all the foregoingACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 21, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 21, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 14, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 14, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 14, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 10, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance