Drawing for SPAM SHREDDER

USPTO serial 78372918

SPAM SHREDDER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
YAO, GRETTA
Law office
PHOTOCOMP COORDINATOR

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SPAM SHREDDER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Andrew Hartman

ANDREW HARTMAN COOLEY GODWARD LLP380 INTERLOCKEN CRESCENT STE 900BROOMFIELD, CO 80021-8023UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software, namely, computer software for providing security features to detect, identify, block and delete unsolicited emailABANDONED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 31, 2006ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION
Mar 28, 2006ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED
Mar 28, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 16, 2006EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED
Mar 8, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Feb 22, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Feb 18, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Feb 17, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Feb 17, 2005GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Feb 17, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Feb 15, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 15, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Sep 6, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 6, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 6, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 10, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance