Drawing for ULTRA3

USPTO serial 78373149

ULTRA3

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BROWN, BARBARA TROFFKIN
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with ULTRA3?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Gregory S. Bernabeo

GREGORY S BERNABEO SYNNESTVEDT & LECHNER LLP2600 ARAMARK TWR 1101 MARKET STPHILADELPHIA, PA 19107-2950UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
044Patient screening for genetic defects; medical testing; medical testing information services, namely, providing information regarding results of patient screening for genetic defects; and consultation services, namely, providing medical counseling in the field of geneticsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 9, 2006MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jan 7, 2006ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jan 7, 2006OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jan 7, 2006OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Jul 21, 2005OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jul 20, 2005OPPFOPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jun 21, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 1, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 9, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 4, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 2, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 1, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 24, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 24, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 21, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 20, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 13, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 10, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance