Drawing for BT BIG TIMES BRANDS

USPTO serial 78373691

BT BIG TIMES BRANDS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
DUBOIS, SUSAN L
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BT BIG TIMES BRANDS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Nancy K. Gardner

NANCY K GARDNER NEEDLE & ROSENBERG PC999 PEACHTREE ST STE 1000ATLANTA, GA 30309-3915UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Protective gloves for industrial use, disposable latex gloves for laboratory use, and disposable plastic gloves for laboratory useACTIVE
010Gloves for medical use, latex medical gloves, and surgical glovesACTIVE
021Disposable latex gloves for general use, disposable plastic gloves for general use, disposable plastic gloves for use in the food service industry, gardening gloves, household gloves for general use, household plastic gloves, and rubber household glovesACTIVE
025Bicycle gloves, gloves, motorcycle gloves, riding gloves, ski gloves, and snowboard glovesACTIVE
028Batting gloves, golf gloves, racquet ball gloves, waterski gloves, and weight lifting glovesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 21, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 21, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 22, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 28, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 8, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Oct 27, 2004PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Oct 20, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Oct 7, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Sep 28, 2004TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Sep 20, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 20, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 17, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 17, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 15, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 11, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance