USPTO serial 78373838
EINTEROP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3442175Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 3, 2008
- Examiner
- CLYBURN, CARLA DIONNE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with EINTEROP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Pamela Payne Smith
Pamela Payne Smith Balch & Bingham LLP1901 Sixth Avenue NorthSuite 1500Birmingham, AL 35203Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer graphics software; computer software providing a textual and graphical interface to access and manipulate data from multiple disparate sources; and user manuals sold therewith | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 28, 2006 |
| 042 | Computer software consultation, design, development, installation, configuration, integration, maintenance, upgrading, testing, repair, and leasing for others; computer programming for others; computer system, software and application analysis; computer systems consultation; computer systems integration; web development services, namely, designing and implementing network web applications for others; computer project management services; data conversion, data migration, and data integration services; data model development services; all preceding services are provided for others | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 12, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Intergraph Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Intergraph Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Intergraph Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named EINTEROP
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 4, 2019 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jun 3, 2017 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2014 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Nov 24, 2014 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 5, 2014 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2014 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 3, 2014 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2014 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 27, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 27, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 10, 2011 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Dec 3, 2008 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 24, 2008 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 21, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 10, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 3, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 29, 2008 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 29, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 29, 2008 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 10, 2008 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 18, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2008 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Sep 18, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 20, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 7, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 27, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 17, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jan 10, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Nov 7, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 27, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 28, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 3, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 14, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 9, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 4, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 2, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 30, 2005 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| May 5, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 5, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 18, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 18, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 20, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 18, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 11, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |