USPTO serial 78373977
HILL COUNTRY FARE SABOR TRADICIONAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EISINGER, REBECCA MILES
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HILL COUNTRY FARE SABOR TRADICIONAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kirt S. O'Neill
KIRT S O'NEILL AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD LLPPO BOX 12870SAN ANTONIO, TX 78212UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Coffee; tea; cocoa; sugar; rice; tapioca; sago; artificial coffee substitutes; flour; breakfast cereals; cereal-based snack foods; ready-to-eat, cereal-derived food bars; bread; biscuits; cakes; pastry; frozen confections; ice creams; honey; table syrup; yeast; baking powder; salt; mustard; vinegar; seasoning sauces; spices; flavored ice; shakes and sauces containing chocolate or milk; flavoring syrups; chocolate candies; candy with caramel; sauces, namely, mole; topping syrups, namely; cajeta | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by HEB Grocery Company, L.P.
- Other trademarks owned by HEB Grocery Company, L.P.
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named HILL COUNTRY FARE SABOR TRADICIONAL
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 11, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 11, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 9, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 4, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 7, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 8, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 13, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 24, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 3, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 3, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 12, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 12, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 12, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 29, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 29, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 19, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 5, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 10, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 10, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 16, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 15, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 15, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 10, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 10, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 18, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 15, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 4, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 4, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 29, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 12, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |