USPTO serial 78374589
LET ME B.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EVANKO, PATRICIA MALESARDI
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LET ME B.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Wilmington, DE
Wilmington, DE
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | NON-MEDICATED SKIN CARE PREPARATIONS; HAIR CARE PREPARATIONS; NON-MEDICATED SHAVING BALM AND GEL; HAND SOAPS; FACIAL SOAPS; BODY CARE PRODUCTS, NAMELY, BODY SOAPS, BODY CREAMS, BODY LOTIONS, BODY POWDERS, NON-MEDICATED DEODORANTS AND ANTI-PERSPIRANTS; SUNCARE PRODUCTS, NAMELY, SUNSCREEN, SUN BLOCK AND SUN TANNING PREPARATIONS; PREPARATIONS TO PROTECT THE SKIN FROM THE SUN, NAMELY, SUN CREAMS AND AFTER-SUN LOTIONS; BATH PRODUCTS, NAMELY, BATH BEADS, BATH FOAM, BATH GELS, BATH LOTION, BATH OIL, BATH POWDER, AND NON-MEDICATED BATH SALTS; PERFUME, COLOGNE, TOILET WATER; COSMETICS AND MAKEUP; ESSENTIAL OILS FOR PERSONAL USE | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | EYEWEAR, SUNGLASSES, EYEGLASS FRAMES, EYEGLASS LENSES AND EYEGLASS CASES; COMPUTER CARRYING CASES; COMPACT DISC CASES; CARRYING CASES FOR BEEPERS; CARRYING CASES FOR CELLULAR TELEPHONES, COMPUTERS AND PERSONAL DIGITAL ASSISTANTS | ACTIVE | — |
| 014 | WATCHES, JEWELRY | ACTIVE | — |
| 018 | HANDBAGS, PURSES, WALLETS, BILLFOLDS, COIN PURSES, CREDIT CARD WALLETS; KEY CASES; CLUTCHES, LUGGAGE, LUGGAGE TAGS AND STRAPS; TOTE BAGS, BACKPACKS, KNAPSACKS, SATCHELS, DUFFEL BAGS, VANITY CASES SOLD EMPTY; UMBRELLAS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by IP Holdings LLC
- Other trademarks owned by IP Holdings LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Similar marks named LET ME B.
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 7, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 7, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 27, 2007 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 27, 2007 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 19, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 19, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 7, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Feb 2, 2007 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 2, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 20, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 29, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 23, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 11, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 11, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 11, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 14, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 14, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 13, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 13, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 13, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 6, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 6, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 1, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 7, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 17, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 1, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 1, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 20, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 20, 2004 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 16, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 16, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 16, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 15, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 12, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |