Drawing for EMAIL IS GOOD AGAIN

USPTO serial 78374799

EMAIL IS GOOD AGAIN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LUKEN, BONNIE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EMAIL IS GOOD AGAIN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Joi A. White, Jefferson F. Scher and all other attorneys

JOI A WHITE CARR & FERRELL LLP2200 GENG RDPALO ALTO, CA 94303UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer hardware; computer software for the detection, blocking, filtering and modification of unsolicited, bulk, and junk electronic messages; computer software for data integrity and security; malicious code and malicious content screening software; computer security software; computer hardware and software for monitoring, filtering and modifying messages, files, programs and data retrieved or received from computer and communication networks; firewall hardware and software; computer software for network security, network management, protection and recovery from computer viruses, copy protection, transferring data between portable computer devices and desktop and networked computers, and for linking text records with electronic images; computer utility and antivirus software; computer software for use with electronic mail, local area network, internal corporate network, file and proxy servers and structural parts and fittings for all the aforesaid computer hardwareACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 22, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 22, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 10, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 29, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 13, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 13, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 11, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 11, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 20, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 28, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 8, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 18, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 11, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 4, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 4, 2005GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 4, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 7, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 16, 2004GNPEEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Sep 16, 2004CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Sep 15, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 15, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance