USPTO serial 78374992
LIFESTYLE PREMIUM DELI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3086300Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 25, 2006
- Examiner
- MURRAY, DAVID T
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with LIFESTYLE PREMIUM DELI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
CARGILL MEAT SOLUTIONS CORPORATION
WICHITA, KS
Other trademarks owned by CARGILL MEAT SOLUTIONS CORPORATION
Springfield, MO
Springfield, MO
Springfield, MO
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kelly M. McLain
Kelly M. McLain Cargill, IncorporatedPO Box 5624Law Department - MS 24Minneapolis, MN 55440Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | meats and poultry | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 16, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CARGILL MEAT SOLUTIONS CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by Willow Brook Foods, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Willow Brook Foods, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Willow Brook Foods, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Similar marks named LIFESTYLE PREMIUM DELI
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 2, 2016 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Apr 25, 2015 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2012 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2012 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 2, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 11, 2012 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 1, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 4, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 25, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 10, 2006 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 7, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 15, 2006 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 7, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 26, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 26, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 2, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 2, 2005 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 2, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 28, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2005 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Mar 15, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 21, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 1, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 18, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 18, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 15, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 15, 2004 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 15, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 15, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |