USPTO serial 78375099
WEBSTER BUSINESS CREDIT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COGGINS, ROBERT H
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WEBSTER BUSINESS CREDIT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Diane Duhaime
DIANE DUHAIME JORDEN BURT LLP175 POWDER FOREST DR STE 201SIMSBURY, CT 6089UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | financial services, namely, asset-based lending services, commercial lending services, financing services, retail financing services, trade financing services, providing working capital loans, revolving working capital loans, term loan facilities, credit facilities, capital expenditure lines of credit and letters of credit, and cash management services, including, account reconciliation, agent deposit reporting, automated clearing house, controlled disbursement, financial electronic data interchange reporting, lockbox processing, wire transfers and zero balance accounts for manufacturing, distribution, wholesale, retail, and service entities and others | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 27, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 23, 2006 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| May 22, 2006 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 21, 2006 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 22, 2006 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2006 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 15, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 22, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 20, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 20, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 20, 2005 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 23, 2005 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 23, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 21, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 24, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 24, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 19, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 19, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 16, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 15, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |