USPTO serial 78375144
ALPHATRONICS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BEVERLY, JOSETTE MICHELLE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ALPHATRONICS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Arlington, MA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard L. Sampson
RICHARD L SAMPSON SAMPSON & ASSOCIATES PC50 CONGRESS ST STE 519BOSTON, MA 2109UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electronic System Equipment Products, namely: wiring centers/cabinets; junction boxes; patch panels; multi-function cabling; wall plates & outlets; speakers; video cameras; fire detection sensors; intrusion detection sensors; volume controls; thermostats; amplifiers; digital/analog video players & recorders; computer systems; central processing units; control panels; programmable logic controllers; communication transmitters and receivers, namely telephone, RF, and internet communicators; routers/hubs; user interface devices, namely, keypads & touchscreens; proximity card readers; power supplies; transformers; batteries; television monitors; and stereophonic receivers | ACTIVE | Dec 1, 1981 |
| 037 | Installation, inspection, maintenance and trouble call services for electronic equipment and systems, namely, security; fire detection; card access control; video for entertainment and/or surveillance; biometric recognition; environmental condition detection for high/low temperature, moisture, flood, or gas; intercom; sound; lighting control; energy management; network; home theater, system integration; automatic programmable logic controllers; remote system access facilities via web browser, telephone, keyfob, touchscreen; telephone, RF, and internet communicators; and system programming | ACTIVE | Dec 1, 1981 |
| 045 | Central Station Monitoring Services for electronic equipment and systems via telephone, RF, and internet communicators, namely, security; fire detection; card access control; video for entertainment and/or surveillance; biometric recognition; environmental condition detection for high/low temperature, moisture, flood, or gas; intercom; sound; lighting control; energy management; network; home theater, system integration; automatic programmable logic controllers; and remote system access via web browser, telephone, keyfob, touchscreen | ACTIVE | Dec 1, 1981 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 25, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 24, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 22, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 16, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 15, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |