USPTO serial 78375506
FLY EASTERN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAHONEY, PAULA M
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FLY EASTERN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Lauth, Edward J./Edward J. Lauth III
State College, PA
Other trademarks owned by Lauth, Edward J./Edward J. Lauth III
EASTERN AIR LINES INC. N/K/A NEW EASTERN AIR LINES INC.
MIAMI, FL
Other trademarks owned by EASTERN AIR LINES INC. N/K/A NEW EASTERN AIR LINES INC.
EASTERN AIR LINES INC. N/K/A NEW EASTERN AIR LINES INC.
MIAMI, FL
Other trademarks owned by EASTERN AIR LINES INC. N/K/A NEW EASTERN AIR LINES INC.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David J. Kera
DAVID J KERA OBLON, SPIVAK, MCCLELLAND, MAIER, & NE1940 DUKE STALEXANDRIA, VA 22314UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 039 | TRANSPORTATION OF PERSONS, PROPERTY, AND MAIL BY AIR; AIRLINE PASSENGER SERVICES IN THE NATURE OF A FREQUENT FLYER PROGRAMS; PROVIDING INFORMATION IN THE FIELD OF TRAVEL AND TRANSPORTATION VIA THE INTERNET | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Lauth, Edward J./Edward J. Lauth III
- Other trademarks owned by EASTERN AIR LINES INC. N/K/A NEW EASTERN AIR LINES INC.
- Other trademarks owned by EASTERN AIR LINES INC. N/K/A NEW EASTERN AIR LINES INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Similar marks named FLY EASTERN
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 16, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 9, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 27, 2009 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Aug 27, 2009 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2009 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 22, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 22, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 22, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 2, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 1, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 1, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 1, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 28, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 28, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 10, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 24, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 9, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 2, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 25, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 5, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 13, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 7, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 7, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 11, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 14, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 13, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 30, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 16, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |