Drawing for FLY EASTERN

USPTO serial 78375506

FLY EASTERN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MAHONEY, PAULA M
Law office
LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FLY EASTERN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David J. Kera

DAVID J KERA OBLON, SPIVAK, MCCLELLAND, MAIER, & NE1940 DUKE STALEXANDRIA, VA 22314UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
039TRANSPORTATION OF PERSONS, PROPERTY, AND MAIL BY AIR; AIRLINE PASSENGER SERVICES IN THE NATURE OF A FREQUENT FLYER PROGRAMS; PROVIDING INFORMATION IN THE FIELD OF TRAVEL AND TRANSPORTATION VIA THE INTERNETACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 16, 2009ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Sep 9, 2009ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Aug 27, 2009MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Aug 27, 2009ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Aug 26, 2009EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Apr 22, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 22, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 22, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 2, 2009RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Oct 1, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 1, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 1, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 28, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 28, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 10, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 24, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 9, 2006RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Feb 2, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 25, 2005GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 25, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jul 5, 2005PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jun 13, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 7, 2005PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jun 7, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 11, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 14, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 14, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 13, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 30, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 16, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance