Drawing for EASTERN

USPTO serial 78375547

EASTERN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SHARPER JR, SAM
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EASTERN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David J. Kera

DAVID J KERA OBLON, SPIVAK, MCCLELLAND, MAIER & NEUST1940 DUKE STALEXANDRIA, VA 22314UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
039TRANSPORTATION OF PERSONS, PROPERTY, AND MAIL BY AIR; AIRLINE PASSENGER SERVICES IN THE NATURE OF A FREQUENT FLYER PROGRAM; PROVIDING INFORMATION IN THE FIELD OF TRAVEL AND TRANSPORTATION BY ELECTRONIC MEANSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 16, 2009ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Sep 9, 2009ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Aug 27, 2009MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Aug 27, 2009ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Aug 26, 2009EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
May 26, 2009GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
May 26, 2009GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 26, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 6, 2009RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Nov 6, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 6, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 17, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 2, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 27, 2006GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 27, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Aug 9, 2006RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jan 12, 2006GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 12, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jan 11, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Dec 30, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 30, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 15, 2005GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 15, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Aug 15, 2005PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jun 7, 2005PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jun 7, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 27, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 27, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 7, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 17, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 17, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 16, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 30, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 16, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance