Drawing for HOME CREST

USPTO serial 78375611

HOME CREST

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
KING, LINDA M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HOME CREST?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lynne E. Graybeal

LYNNE E GRAYBEAL PERKINS COIE LLP1201 3RD AVE STE 4800SEATTLE, WA 98101UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Monitoring consumer credit reports and providing an alert as to changes therein; providing referrals in the field of fraud protection in the area of personal identity fraud and identity theft; providing consumer information about goods and services in the field of fraud protection in the area of personal identity fraud and identity theft; providing interactive websites containing information and online enrollment related to the foregoing servicesACTIVE
045Fraud detection services in the field of personal identity fraud and identity theft; private investigation; detective investigations; private investigative services, namely locating and providing information to others concerning consumer and identity fraud and identity theft; professional assistance in the field of fraud detection in the area of personal identity fraud and identity theft, namely, filing claims, handling creditors and closing accounts necessitated by identity theft and fraud; providing on-line information in the field of fraud detection in the area of personal identity fraud and identity theftACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 31, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 31, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 27, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 5, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 15, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Mar 31, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Mar 25, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Mar 22, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Mar 15, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Mar 7, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 7, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 17, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 17, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 16, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 16, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance