USPTO serial 78375723
MEXOTIC GOURMET CUISINE AMERICA'S FINEST MEXICAN FOODS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AMOS, TANYA L
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MEXOTIC GOURMET CUISINE AMERICA'S FINEST MEXICAN FOODS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Barry F. Soalt
BARRY F SOALT PROCOPIO CORY HARGREAVES & SAVITCH LLP530 B ST STE 2100SAN DIEGO, CA 92101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | FROZEN, PACKAGED, AND PREPARED ENTREES, APPETIZERS AND SOUPS, CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF MEAT, SEAFOOD, POULTRY, CHEESE, VEGETABLES, AND/OR FILLINGS OF MEAT, SEAFOOD, POULTRY, CHEESE, AND VEGETABLES MADE WITH A PROPRIETARY BLEND OF CHILES, SPICES AND HERBS | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | FROZEN, PACKAGED, AND PREPARED ENTREES AND APPETIZERS CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF RICE AND PASTA; SAUCES, NAMELY SAUCES CONSISTING OF A UNIQUE BLEND OF VEGETABLES AND/OR FRUITS AND/OR HERBS AND/OR SPICES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Bottiger Enterprises, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Bottiger Enterprises, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named MEXOTIC GOURMET CUISINE AMERICA'S FINEST MEXICAN FOODS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 24, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 24, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 23, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 31, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 11, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 16, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 10, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 4, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 4, 2005 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 4, 2005 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 3, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 17, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 16, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 17, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |