Drawing for VERIFY

USPTO serial 78375806

VERIFY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HWANG, JOHN C B
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with VERIFY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Manender Grewal

Manender Grewal M Grewal & Co.Block 1227/AKowloon, 91030

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Provision of business information including Business Inquiries, Business Information, Business Research, Business Investigation, Commercial Information Services, Employment Screening Services, Employment Verification Services, Vendor Screening Services, Due Diligence ServicesABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 1, 2007MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Aug 1, 2007ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jul 30, 2007OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jul 30, 2007OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Jan 22, 2007OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jan 12, 2007ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Jan 12, 2007OPPFOPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jan 10, 2007ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Dec 22, 2006ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Dec 8, 2006ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Oct 3, 2006UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Aug 24, 2006ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jul 25, 2006UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Jul 25, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 5, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 9, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 12, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 12, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 4, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 4, 2006RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Oct 28, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 31, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 23, 2005GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 23, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 17, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 8, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 8, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 1, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 1, 2005FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Sep 20, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 20, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 16, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 17, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance