USPTO serial 78376252
REDLINE TV
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3141133Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 12, 2006
- Examiner
- PENDLETON, CAROLYN A
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with REDLINE TV?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
STEVEN E. YOUNG
STEVEN E. YOUNG FREEMAN, FREEMAN & SMILEY, LLP3415 SOUTH SEPULVEDA BLVD.STE 1200LOS ANGELES, CA 90034Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Pre-recorded CD's video tapes, laser disks and DVD's featuring automotive racing * and sold solely via the registrant's website and/or websites of affiliated companies in connection with the registrant's television programs * | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 9, 2004 |
| 041 | Entertainment in the nature of on-going television programs in the field of automotive racing | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 9, 2004 |
| 042 | Providing customized on-line web pages featuring user defined information, which includes search engines and on-line web links to other websites | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 9, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Schiefer Media, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Schiefer Media, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Schiefer Media, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by WATV LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named REDLINE TV
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 14, 2017 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Sep 4, 2008 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Sep 4, 2008 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 4, 2008 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 28, 2008 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| May 28, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 2, 2008 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 24, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 12, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 21, 2006 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 3, 2006 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 7, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 15, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 24, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 20, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 19, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 10, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 3, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 3, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 28, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 28, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 16, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 10, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 10, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 10, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 10, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 16, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 25, 2004 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 22, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 11, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 11, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 18, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 18, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 17, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |