USPTO serial 78376367
SAFE STEP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BELLO, ZACK
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SAFE STEP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark J. Liss
MARK J LISS LEYDIG, VOIT & MAYER LTDTWO PRUDENTIAL PLZ STE 4900, 180 NCHICAGO, IL 60601-6780UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 002 | Paints, varnishes, lacquers; preservatives against rust; raw natural resins; metals in foil and powder form for painters and decorators; paints, varnishes, lacquers having anti-slip properties; anti-slip sprays and coatings in the nature of paints; primers; epoxy resins for use in covering floors, paths, roads, decks, ramps, stairs; epoxy resin anti-slip floor, path, road, deck, ramp, stair coverings; epoxy resins for use in repairing floors and flooring, paths, roads, decks, ramps, stairs; epoxy resins for use in repairing concrete and asphalt | ABANDONED | — |
| 006 | Anti-slip panels, boards, blocks, tiles and tile floorings for building construction; anti-slip stairs, stair treads, and stair inserts; all predominantly of metal | ABANDONED | — |
| 017 | Rubber, gutta-percha, gum, asbestos, mica for use in the manufacture of anti-slip stairs, stair-treads, and stair tread inserts in the form of self-adhesive tapes; rubber, gutta-percha, gum, asbestos, mica having anti-slip properties; anti-slip tapes; self-adhesive anti-slip tapes | ABANDONED | — |
| 019 | Anti-slip non-metal panels, boards, blocks, tiles and tile floorings for building construction, anti-slip stairs, stair-treads, and stair tread inserts and anti-slip tread inserts in the form of self-adhesive tapes | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Illinois Tool Works Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Illinois Tool Works Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 002
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Similar marks named SAFE STEP
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 13, 2006 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 13, 2006 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 13, 2006 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 13, 2006 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 25, 2006 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 21, 2006 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 31, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 11, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 19, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 19, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 2, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 1, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 1, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 29, 2005 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 28, 2005 | GEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2005 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 9, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 31, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 31, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 7, 2004 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 30, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 17, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 17, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 8, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 7, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 17, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |