USPTO serial 78377294
SMIC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAHONEY, PAULA M
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SMIC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Semiconductor Manufacturing International (Shanghai) Corporation
Shanghai, CN
Other trademarks owned by Semiconductor Manufacturing International (Shanghai) Corporation
Semiconductor Manufacturing International (Shanghai) Corporation
Shanghai, CN
Other trademarks owned by Semiconductor Manufacturing International (Shanghai) Corporation
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David E. Sipiora
DAVID E SIPIORA KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP1400 WEWATTA STREETSUITE 600DENVER, CO 80202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | SEMICONDUCTORS AND INTEGRATED CIRCUITS, SEMICONDUCTORS AND INTEGRATED CIRCUITS, NAMELY, APPLICATION-SPECIFIC INTEGRATED CIRCUITS, LOGIC CHIPS, MIXED SIGNAL CHIPS AND MEMORY CHIPS; PARTS AND CHIP PACKAGING FOR SEMICONDUCTORS AND INTEGRATED CIRCUITS, NAMELY, APPLICATION-SPECIFIC INTEGRATED CIRCUITS, LOGIC CHIPS, MIXED SIGNAL CHIPS AND MEMORY CHIPS; PACKAGED SEMICONDUCTORS AND INTEGRATED CIRCUITS, NAMELY, APPLICATION-SPECIFIC INTEGRATED CIRCUITS, LOGIC CHIPS, MIXED SIGNAL CHIPS AND MEMORY CHIPS; PHOTO MASKS; INTEGRATED CIRCUIT CARDS AND BOARDS; WAFERS, NAMELY, THOSE COMPRISING GERMANIUM/SILICON; TRANSISTORS; MAGNETIC CODED CARDS FOR USE IN CONSUMER ELECTRONIC PRODUCTS; PRINTED CIRCUITS; BLANK SMART CARDS AND SIM CARDS FOR USE IN CONSUMER ELECTRONIC PRODUCTS; MICRODISPLAY DEVICES, NAMELY, LIQUID CRYSTAL DISPLAYS ON SILICON PANEL; EPOXY PROBE CARDS FOR USE IN TESTING | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Semiconductor Manufacturing International (Shanghai) Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Semiconductor Manufacturing International (Shanghai) Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named SMIC
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 23, 2011 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 23, 2011 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 23, 2011 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 23, 2010 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 5, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 7, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 7, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 30, 2006 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 30, 2006 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 16, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 26, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 27, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 24, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 20, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 28, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 23, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 23, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 21, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 21, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 17, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 17, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 21, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 23, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 23, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 25, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 25, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 18, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 18, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |