USPTO serial 78377308
CODELOCKS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 18, 2005
- Examiner
- DE JONGE, KATHLEEN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with CODELOCKS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Clinton G. Newton
Clinton G. Newton Shook, Hardy & Bacon L.L.P.2555 Grand Blvd.Kansas City, MO 64108United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | METAL LOCKS, NAMELY, NON-ELECTRIC COMBINATION LOCKS, NON-ELECTRIC COMBINATION DOOR LOCKS,[ BIKE LOCKS,] BATHROOM LOCKS, CAMLOCKS, CABINET LOCKS, CHECK LOCKS, COMBINATION LOCKS, CYLINDER LOCKS, DOOR LOCKS, DRAWER LOCKS, HOOKBOLT LOCKS, FURNITURE LOCKS, MORTISE LOCKS, MULTILEVER MORTISE LOCKS, DEAD BOLT LOCKS, [MULTIPOINT LOCKS,] NIGHT LATCH LOCKS,[ RING LOCKS, MULTILEVER RIM LOCKS, PUMP CYLINDER RIM LOCKS,] LOCKS FOR SAFES, GARDEN LOCKS, PATIO DOOR LOCKS, SLIDING DOOR LOCKS, SASH LOCKS, [SCREW LOCKS,] STYLE LOCKS, [SPRING LOCKS, STAY LOCKS, SWING BOLT LOCKS,] LOCKS FOR METAL DOORS, LOCKS FOR ROLLING SHUTTERS, LOCKS FOR UP AND OVER DOORS, UTILITY LOCKS, WINDOW LOCKS; [PADLOCKS, PIN TUMBLER PADLOCKS, STEEL PADLOCKS, PADLOCKS FOR CHAINS, ROLLING SHUTTER PADLOCKS, SPECIAL APPLICATION PADLOCKS, VISUAL PACKED PADLOCKS, ARMORED PADLOCKS AND] DEADLOCKS; LOCK SETS COMPRISED OF METAL LOCKS AND METAL KEYS THEREFOR; METAL LOCK CASES; METAL LOCK BODIES; METAL LOCK CYLINDERS; METAL LOCK MECHANISMS; REPLACEMENT PARTS AND FITTINGS FOR THE AFORESAID GOODS | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | ACCESS CONTROL APPARATUS, NAMELY, ACCESS CONTROL SYSTEMS; ELECTRONICALLY CONTROLLED LOCKS; ELECTRONIC COMBINATION LOCKS; ELECTRONIC COMBINATION DOOR LOCKS; [ELECTRONICALLY OPERATED DOOR CLOSERS;] ELECTRIC CONTROL APPARATUS FOR DOORS; ELECTRONIC DOOR LOCKS; [MAGNETICALLY ENCODED KEY CARDS; ELECTRICALLY CONTROLLED DOOR LOCKS ACTIVATED BY KEY CARDS; COMPUTER-CONTROLLED APPARATUS FOR CODING KEY CARDS; COMBINED ELECTRONICALLY CONTROLLED DOOR HOLDERS/CLOSERS; ELECTRIC DOOR CONTROL AND MONITOR PANELS; ELECTRICAL AUTOMATIC DOOR APPARATUS; ELECTROMAGNETIC DOOR HOLDERS; ELECTROMAGNETIC FLOOR CLOSERS; ELECTROMAGNETIC DOOR RELEASERS; ELECTROMAGNETIC LOCKS] ; ALARMS NOT BEING FOR VEHICLES, ALARM LOCKS; PUSHBUTTON ELECTRONIC LOCKS; [ELECTROMECHANICAL DOOR HOLDER RELEASES; ELECTROMECHANICAL DOOR HOLDERS/CLOSERS;] ELECTROMECHANICAL DOOR LATCHES; CONSOLES, NAMELY, ELECTRONIC ACCESS KEYPAD CONSOLES; [KEY-OPERATED ELECTRONIC CONTROLS; CARD-OPERATED ELECTRONIC LOCKS; KEY PADS FOR PROGRAMMABLE LOCKING SYSTEMS, KEY PAD OPERATED LOCKS; SOLENOID OPERATED LOCKS;] ELECTROMECHANICAL EXIT DEVICES, NAMELY, ELECTROMECHANICAL DOOR OPENERS; ELECTRONICALLY-CONTROLLED DOOR OPENING DEVICES; AUTOMATIC ACTIVATING DEVICES FOR OPENING DOORS; [ELECTRONICALLY CONTROLLED DOOR CLOSING DEVICES;] REPLACEMENT PARTS AND FITTINGS FOR THE AFORESAID GOODS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Codelocks Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Codelocks Limited
- Other trademarks owned by CODELOCKS INTERNATIONAL LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named CODELOCKS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 14, 2025 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2025 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Feb 14, 2025 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Feb 14, 2025 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 21, 2024 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 18, 2024 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 4, 2024 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 19, 2023 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jan 19, 2023 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 19, 2023 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 19, 2023 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 19, 2023 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 6, 2016 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2016 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Feb 6, 2016 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Feb 6, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 20, 2015 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 9, 2011 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2011 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Nov 15, 2011 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 8, 2011 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Oct 21, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 11, 2011 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2011 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 18, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 18, 2005 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Sep 6, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 2, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 2, 2005 | ATRQ | ATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED | — |
| Aug 30, 2005 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 30, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 26, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 26, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 26, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 26, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 26, 2005 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 22, 2005 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 22, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 17, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 11, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 11, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 19, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 19, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 18, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 18, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |